Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@TrudyandTaco says : I wish I was smart enough to retain this. I had a physics class in college and I lost years off my life getting through it. lol>> <<@SanWasntHere says : Tf is that periodic table, never saw it like that>> <<@AxolotlGamer-7 says : My suggestion for naming the 2D elements: Keep the 3D names based on number, but add Dyodiastic before it (e.g., Dyodiastic Arsenic)>> <<@nielskorpel8860 says : Is point 2 still true in the moment that you have multiple electrons?>> <<@carl_in_denial says : This is a genius thought experiment.>> <<@joed180 says : I’ve decided Minute Physics guy is super cute.>> <<@InterloperBob says : Given that our senses can't comprehend most of the dimensions we think we live in, it's not that far fetched to think that depth is also illusory, and that we do live in a 2D world. We could just be creating depth from optical illusions.>> <<@Easton-n7b says : I wish your vids are longer>> <<@jeffreyblack666 says : This doesn't seem right. My understanding is that the orbitals are a result of spherical harmonics. Going to 2D this should result in them being harmonics for a disc, which should just mean you lose the ml term. That means you should just get for any value of n where they are permitted, a single s orbital, a single p orbtial, a single d orbital, and so on. So your table has too many elements.>> <<@PaitynPlayzzz says : Did we just get a 7 second minute physics inside a minute physics?>> <<@deepledarthes says : Next time I get 3 wishes from a genie I’m going to wish that our universe is 2D>> <<@Edens_E-den says : This is the best diagram and explanation for this I've ever experienced. I feel like I should've at least seen that orbital graph before.>> <<@EricB256 says : Does this somehow have got a practical application in the world of fluid crystals?>> <<@AJconquerorOG says : Wait whart? James, my name is James and I'm born may 17th!>> <<@sofiac6911 says : i was watching at 0.9x and it still felt a little fast at times lol. good video!>> <<@Mr_Fluffy_Paws says : *hits blunt* "Bro what if our universe was actually 2D" "BUT WHAT ABOUT THE PERIODIC TABLE?">> <<@ShaharBialer-qu6rc says : error at 1st naming system at z=2,it should be He, not Be>> <<@olioloj says : Holy shit he found an infinite money glitch: just sell each frame of the video>> <<@axospyeyes281 says : Just use 2d scrhödinger and solve for the function with n electrons lmao>> <<@Anastazja_Nya says : you have explained the angilar momentum better than any chem teacher in poland, finally after i finished my chem i finally know it :3>> <<@joshuahudson2170 says : Problem: electron orbitals are unstable in 2D.>> <<@NerdBryant64 says : "no. 2 belium">> <<@addisonballif2988 says : Is this assuming electrons are still fermions with exchange phase of -1, and could you create a periodic table using anyons and considering how the electrons braid around each other? Maybe that is a different question than just determining the lowest energy values to sort the elements on a table.>> <<@VictorJacob-j9u says : Name proposal: call them by their number value on the table>> <<@sachiko6530 says : Xenons a solid!>> <<@albertkamego600 says : what about 1d ? or 0D?>> <<@devinnall2284 says : I know normally 3D objects passing through a 2D word would have a cross section of their shape appear in that world before disappearing But what if only a single atom of a 3 Dimensional element passed through a 2 Dimensional world would it behave like the 2D version of that element?>> <<@SuperMandzioMan says : why is everything in 2D so simple? also, did you know there is NO way to walk in 2D? anyway, if 2D is so simple and 3D is more complicated then i don't want to be a student in 4D. but imagine electrons traveling into the fourth dimension and back! wait...>> <<@borbelylevici says : So in Death's End they will have to use this periodic table in the solar system in the end?>> <<@NotaTechGuy177 says : We also have to put the electrons and nuclei in a hydraulic press to make them 2d>> <<@MsZeeZed says : Flatland is blingless, who knew 😺>> <<@jhhyyggg says : I need to know more>> <<@Jb_pREM says : I wanna see a 5dih😍 periodic table>> <<@atharvyadav-us4wn says : what is that background sound>> <<@---pd5tz says : Since electrons cant be free of any existing nucleii that means the world would be just one big molecule.>> <<@DwAboutItManFr says : 2D elements should have their own names.>> <<@FranticErrors says : Now I want someone to make a cover of the asapscience elements song but in 2d (1d vocals?)>> <<@ohmegatronn says : I'm here for cowernium>> <<@nicolasd140 says : Important caveat : in a 2D universe, assuming intelligent life developped an understanding of their universe's physics, their periodic table would have to be 1D, as their vision could only be 1D, just as our vision is only a 2D plane (with depth perception and colours of course)>> <<@YTEdy says : Cool. Do 4D next. 🙂>> <<@The-Nerd-Empire says : 0:01 element 119 and 120 cameo>> <<@manju2872 says : I calculated what a 4d periodic table would look like In a hypothetical 4d word the angular and spin quantum numbers would be pairs of 2 numbers(l1,l2,m1,m2,s1,s2) due to double rotations.there wouldn be a magnetic quantum number as there is no free axis(all axes can be paired simultaneously) Each orbital would be able to hold 4 electrons instead of 2 also because of double rotations. There will be more types of subshells as there will more combinations of l1 and l2. Here is my way of notating them(the first letter is the name of the corresponding 3d orbital of the lower l value and the 2nd one is the one for the higher l value, if they are same I put a '²');- s²:l1,l2=0,0 sp:l1,l2=1,0 or 0,1 sd:l1,l2=2,0 or 0,2 p²:l1,l2=1,1 pd:l1,l2=1,2 or 2,1 and so on. Deducing how many electrons each subshell can contain;- The s² subshell will have 1 configuration(orbital). Other subshells with one l equal to 0 will have 2 configurations(orbitals). All other subshells will have 4 configurations(orbitals). Since the s² subshell consists of only 1 orbital and each orbital can hold 4 electrons, the total capacity is 1 x 4 = 4 (Since there will be 2 of the same subshell in some shells , they will fill simultaneously) Repeating this process tells us;- The s² subshell can hold 1*4=4 electrons, The sp subshell can hold 2*4=8 electrons(will be 2 of these), The sd subshell can hold 2*4=8 electrons(will be 2 of these), The p² subshell can hold 4*4=16 electrons, The pd subshell can hold 4*4=16 electrons(there will be 2 of these) and so on Each period would have(assuming madelung rule stays similar);- 1st period:4 elements 2nd period:4+(2*8)=4+16=20 elements 3rd period:4+(2*8)=4+16=20 elements 4th period:4+(2*8)+(2*8)+16=4+16+16+16=52 elements 5th period:4+(2*8)+(2*8)+16=4+16+16+16=52 elements and so on. Noble gasses would be(again assuming madelung rule stays similar);- 1st period:atomic number 4 2nd period:atomic number 4+20=24 3rd period:atomic number 24+20=44 4th period:atomic number 44+52=96 5th period:atomic number 96+52=148 and so on (Note:I didn't take relativistic effects into account, they will certainly effect the elements in the 4th,5th and 6th period significantly but they are insanely hard to compute.Also the last stable element will probably change as there will be a different nuclear shell model.) -By someone who isn't even 12 as of writing this but is very interested in quantum mechanics.>> <<@DaybreakSystem says : Okay but how would you _draw_ and organise the periodic table in a 2D world? You can't draw it like that or else no one will be able to see any of it beyond the outermost edges, you need to fit all the information in a 1D line.>> <<@EebstertheGreat says : I wonder what the canonical way to define potential would be in a 2D universe. In 3D, we usually measure the potential difference from infinity, but in 2D, forces that diminish as 1/r would have an infinite potential difference from infinity.>> <<@polarisproject1568 says : How does a black hole work in a 2D universe?>> <<@gloweye says : Well, with the differences we can predict. We don't know whether we can predict enough differences.>> <<@cjp1599 says : It all depends on how minifigs look displayed on the micro scale exterior. Will it be done well like the new hogwarts or poorly like barad dur>> <<@maosenlin4170 says : If the force law is 1/r the energy moving an electron farther and farther would diverge. Forcefully moving an electron away from an atom would cause a pair of electron positron to form. I guess chemistry would just never happen.>> <<@Hlebuw3k says : Waiting for the 4D version (I know it's gonna be a nightmare to research and theorize)>> <<@PauxloE says : Of course, in a 2D universe you'll have problems actually looking at a 2D image of a periodic table..>>