Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@MinutePhysics says : Thanks everyone - if anybody wants to help me get all of these visuals into one place (wikipedia, etc), please get in touch via patreon (or my email... it's not too hard to find)!>> <<@KorshrdxxMehadyni says : This was unbelievably satisfying to watch!>> <<@AverySaderPhD says : Very cool.>> <<@gene1491 says : these look like magnetic fields... does that make sense? if the center was the nucleus, then the electron "Cloud" is shaped where the magnetic field would have it. i feel like i could understand physics easily if i took it but that requires a level of math ill sadly never be able to afford. ;(>> <<@IdrisL-l1h says : I know how they look like, they look like steel balls>> <<@kirillun1027 says : Honestly the easy to draw versions are just a lot easier to understand than the 3d models. They didn't seem so different from the donut and blob depictions you said were underwhelming in the beginning>> <<@sepehrhaghverdi8977 says : 4:00 He is actually in s but go on...>> <<@Epitemophile says : Thanks a lot!>> <<@АдрикЪуЪ says : Why does google need sponsorships?? It's fucking google>> <<@PatrickCattermole says : I wanted to see it too.... 🙏>> <<@williamb4652 says : "Shut up and calculate.">> <<@Robin.Hollinger85 says : A longer video with longer shots of each atom, and maybe labels of which they are. Because these models are very cool, but I had no idea what I was looking at before it flipped to another model>> <<@melissou100 says : Mais pourquoi parler si vite ? aussi vite qu'un électron ? impossible !>> <<@smeschia says : The quantum field model is much more accurate. Electrons are excitations in the election field. The electrons in an atom are a standing wave in the election field around the nucleus.>> <<@cassis1018 says : We are still trying to figure out what it is and how it really looks. Great mystery.>> <<@ChrisBlack-d2x says : Very cool>> <<@RobertPattison-k1g says : Great information, thank you.>> <<@John-40414 says : Exquisite.>> <<@Ganymede2076 says : I wonder how molecules, DNA and proteins would look like with your depiction of atoms>> <<@Naigus says : Why do we need to visualise the THEORY of atoms with CGI instead of anyone showing us them? Apparently they were proven by Oppenheimer but not really. A Nikon p1000 can zoom in and reach the moon at millions of miles away so just use one of those to show an atom lol 😂>> <<@1czechit1 says : And this is why physicists are all crazy.>> <<@HoaTrinh-b4h says : Very practical advice.>> <<@lucasg8675 says : I still don't understand, I was confused thinking there are way too many electrons now XD>> <<@ShirleyScalzo says : Very useful tips, thanks!>> <<@Armaan786-e3m says : Very entertaining from start to finish.>> <<@ThePartyCricketGang says : Crazy>> <<@I_am_Brooklyn_rose says : And why don’t I have a dough 1:00>> <<@ClaireChidgey-q8p says : i wanna know if Schrödinger's cat is dead or alive and can i have a rainbow doughnut>> <<@ClaireChidgey-q8p says : RAINBOW DOUGHNUTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!>> <<@accountnotfind4576 says : Your first mistake was asking where it is AND how fast it's going. Pick one>> <<@EmresHarrison says : Wrong wrong wrong like the effort thou>> <<@GrekkssnGaiakansbz says : You�re so talented!>> <<@devoncoyle7700 says : I know I’m about 4 years too late but if the dots in the models shown here are showing the possible places of electrons then aren’t the ones from the beginning accurate but just showing where they are at a specific moment? I feel like I’m missing something to come to this conclusion.>> <<@ANANYA-807 says : But what about their atomic#>> <<@ANANYA-807 says : These dots are infinite in no>> <<@Arid-9 says : and another>> <<@ekinteko says : There's a bit of a misunderstanding in this video. You should think of the "orbitals" as more like a magnetic field. It is not what the Atom looks like, nor what the Electron looks like. It is where it might be at any given moment.>> <<@Billboythe1st says : Jesus Christ died for u although he was innocent he wasn’t willing to spend eternity without u if u have faith in him u will go to heaven I’m not forcing God bless>> <<@SvenPilecki says : Przecież fala uderzeniowa elektronów zniekształca lub nawet rozwiewa wierzchnią warstwę cząsteczki. Poza tym w naturalnych warunkach atom ulega bodźcom takim jak temperatura otoczenia czy też promieniowanie chociażby fotonowe, które się od cząsteczek odbija lub też częściowo wnika. Gdy patrzy się z kolei w głębsze warstwy próbki, to z kolei jedne cząsteczki zasłaniają drugie i wówczas powstają optyczne artefakty. Jedno zakrywa drugie.>> <<@prilveshkrishna3952 says : For a hydrogen atom, which has one proton and one electron, the 1s orbital is spherically symmetric , meaning the electron is equally likely to be found in any direction around the nucleus. However, the probability isn’t the same at all distances. It’s highest near the nucleus and decreases as you move farther away. That is what the 2D and 3D images Accurately potrayed . The 1s orbital is the lowest-energy (ground state) wave function of the hydrogen atom.Its probability density tells us how likely it is to find the electron at a distance r from the nucleus. That probability density is Bohr radius (about 0.529 Å). so it just means: if you look everywhere in that space, you’ll find the electron somewhere. that is why the 1s orbital looks like a Sphere . In my view The 2D and static 3D representations accurately convey it , your 3D representations animations are abit inaccurate and are misleading to a little extent . as you are showing the wave desnity as a particle cloud . although you explain it proper the visuals make it kinda off . like you said the pictures show a fuzzy cloud or a 3blob because they represent areas of probability where the electron will most likely be found . with your representation you have criticaly created additional empty spaces between each 3d item creating wrong exclusion zones / spaces . where as in the 2d and static 3D representations the fuzzyness ensures all the spaces are covered aka all the probability zones are visualized ultimately giving an accurate picture of the probability density>> <<@BarbaraMurry-y2o says : Such a useful explanation.>> <<@JillianneKateLBocol says : this is so pretty 🥹🥹>> <<@Theothernightmarepeople says : My atoms are thinking about atoms while typing on atoms about atoms>> <<@digitalsketchguy7844 says : Every electron is an expression of the universal quantum field. Everything is one. Now draw that?>> <<@Parmaitë says : very cool>> <<@Blueskybuffalo says : The Incredible and frustrating thing about science is sometimes the reality doesn't fit into my perception as a human. That feeling of awe is wonderful and maybe pulling the curtain back too far isn't all positive. Not saying We shouldn't shine a light in every corner of our universe, but personally maybe ignorance is preferred to some degree.>> <<@JanetMLebron says : This was well worth watching.>> <<@blablablabla4236 says : More confused than ever>> <<@excitingfruit says : This is a worse, more confusing depiction of atoms than the original ‘cartoon’ diagrams. Why does the fact that the position of an election is described as a probability distribution have to be represented in the diagram? Why not make the diagram depict an atom *after* the electron position has been measured? How is this an improvement over the “fuzzy cloud” or “ballon” diagrams shown at the beginning?>> <<@SpiritOfLion says : Does it really orbit? I thought it appears and disappears in that cloud of probability>>